ROOTS &
PLANTS
Containers make a difference in aquatic plant growth
By Connie Kaye, Shirley Jo Kelley and Kurt Reiger *
Most aquatic plant growers pay little attention to the
container in which they place their plants. They should. Our study shows
that the container your plant is in will make a huge difference in plant
growth and appearance.
For this study, two aquatic plant growers wanted to
test if using porous fabric containers or the standard plastic
containers would make a difference in the growth and appearance of a
plant. While the vast majority of aquatic plants are grown in plastic,
fabric containers are newer on the market and have gained popularity.
Plants were grown together, side by side, in fabric containers and
plastic pots. All treatment was exactly the same. The plants and their
root structures were then examined.
Plant examination was appropriate to each plant. We
counted leaves, flowers or stems and measured height and/or width.
The study was conducted in two places, Fish N’ Fun in
Odessa, Texas, a retail aquatic plant grower and in Edmond, Oklahoma
with the president of the Water Garden Society of Oklahoma. |
Plant #1 was a Thalia (hardy water Canna) started in April 2002
and examined in September 2002.
The fabric grown plant was noticeably
larger and had 3 flowers.
Measurements were:
In Fabric Container:
13 stems
35 leaves
3 flowers
54” height to tallest leaf
84” height to tip of flower |
In AERO
no holes, 14” top, 11” base:
7 stems
17 leaves
0 flowers
48” height to tallest leaf |
When the containers were removed, we saw the roots in the plastic
container were circling around the outer edge of the pot with no roots
in the middle of the container. In the fabric container, however, there
was no root circling and the roots had filled the fabric thoroughly.
|

Thalia grown in a plastic
and fabric container. With every species tried, the plants grown in fabric filled out
their containers much better than the same plant grown in
plastic.

The root structure of a
plastic container grown Thalia with the root ball partially
washed away. As the root ball is exposed, it becomes obvious
that no roots are growing in the middle of the ball.

Close up of the roots from
the fabric grown Thalia. Both the roots and the tops of the
fabric grown Thalia had grown to twice the size as the Thalia
placed in plastic for the same amount of time.
|

The root structure of a plastic container grown Thalia. Roots are
circling on the outside, leaving a middle area largely devoid of roots.

The root structure of a
fabric container grown Thalia with the bag removed. The roots
have branched and filled the entire pot area. This root
structure has at least twice the volume of roots as in the
plastic pot
|
Plant #2 was a Pickeral Rush, started with 1
division in April, and examined in September, 2002.
The plant grown in
the fabric was larger and had filled the entire container, whereas the
plastic grown plant took up only one side of the pot.
The measurements
were:
In Fabric Container:
4 flowers
45 leaves
could divide to 7 divisions
50” height
68” wide |
In Lerio BP-107 no
holes:
26 leaves
2 flowers
could divide to 4 divisions
44” height
57” wide |
With the containers removed, we noticed roots on only one side of
plastic pot, whereas the roots had completely filled the fabric pot.
Also, the root ball from the plastic container had a very bad smell.
There was no overpowering smell from the root ball grown in fabric.
|
 |
Two Pickeral
Rush, started in April of 2002, after five months. The plant
grown in the porous fabric (right) had filled the entire
container and was more than twice the size as the plant grown
next to it in plastic (left).
|
Plant #3 was a Water Lily (White), planted April and examined
in September, 2002. The plant grown in the fabric was about twice the
size of the plant grown in plastic. The measurements were:
In Fabric Container:
63 leaves
11 buds or flowers |
In Lerio no holes,
16” top, 14” base.
34 leaves
7 buds or flowers |
When the containers were removed, we noticed the roots in the plastic
container were circling on the outside edge of the pots and the soil
mass had pan-caked on the bottom, leaving a large area in the middle
essentially devoid of roots.. In the fabric container the roots had
branched out and had filled the whole ball area. The soil in the plastic
container smelled bad while there was no strong smell from the fabric
container.
|
 |
The root
structure of this Water Lily had pan-caked on the bottom of the
16” plastic no holes container, with the roots circling on the
outer rim of the pot. This root ball had a foul smell.
|
 |
The roots
of the Water Lily from the plant grown in fabric. This root ball
was full of branched roots and was very tight.
|
|

|
White
Water Lilies with the containers removed. The plant grown in
fabric (right) had 63 leaves vs only 34 for the plant grown in a
traditional plastic lily container.
|
Plant #4 was a Dwarf Umbrella Palm, started in March and
examined in September, 2002.
In the Umbrella Palm we found the greatest
differences due to the container, with the plant grown in fabric
literally five times as full as the same plant grown in a closed plastic
pot.
The Umbrella Palm in the plastic pot seemed to struggle the whole
time, and had a number of dead or dying leaves.
The measurements were:
In Fabric Container:
152 stems
24” height |
In Lerio BP85 (no
holes plastic):
24 stems
18” height |
Plant #5 was a Louisiana Iris, planted from a
single clump in March and examined in September, 2002.
The Iris grown in
fabric had completely filled the pot, whereas the Iris grown in the
plastic container was clumped on one side of the container, leaving the
other half of the pot empty. Therefore, the fabric grown Iris was a much
fuller plant, even though the width of both plants was basically the
same. The measurements were:
In Fabric Container:
28 stems
30” width |
In 9” plastic nursery
pots with holes:
9 stems
28” width |
Also noticeable was the formation of some type of green slime on top
of the soil but beneath the mouth of the plastic container. This algae
formation can only be described as gross. With the containers removed,
the fabric grown plant had a root structure that had filled the pot,
whereas the soil directly beneath the Iris in the plastic pot had turned
black and had a foul odor. Some roots had grown out of the drain holes
in the bottom of the plastic pot. These roots were thriving and were the
healthiest roots formed by the plastic container plant.
|

|
The root
structure from a Louisiana Iris grown in a porous fabric
container with the fabric removed. The roots were well branched
and had completely filled the fabric area.
|
A black
rot had developed in the ball area of the Louisiana Iris grown
in the plastic container. Notice the healthy root growth from
the bottom of the plant. These roots had escaped through a drain
hole in the pot and had developed nicely outside the container.
|
 |
Plant #6 was a Bog Lily, started from a single plant in March
and examined in September, 2002.
The most noticeable difference between
the plants was that the Bog Lily grown in fabric had a much deeper,
darker color than the plant grown in plastic. The leaves were deep red
while the stem was a bright green.
In the plastic pot the plant’s leaves
and stems were a pale white with far less red and green.
The fabric
grown Bog Lily had bloomed twice, whereas the plastic grown plant had
only bloomed once.
The measurements were:
In Fabric Container:
6 clumps
36” spread
4 flowers |
In NS Classic 600
pot, 4 bottom holes:
2 clumps
30” spread
1 flower |
When we removed the containers it was obvious the soil in the fabric
pot was much healthier and had a red color close to the appearance of
the clay soil we had first used. In the plastic container the soil had
turned black and had a rotten smell. The root structure was circling on
the outside of the pot and had turned black or had rotted.
|

|
The most
noticeable difference in the Bog Lilies was color. This Bog Lily
grown in fabric had a deep red and green color in the leaves,
while the stems were deep yellow and green.
|
This Bog
Lily, grown in a plastic container, had fewer leaves and poor
coloring in the leaves and stems. The soil in the plastic
container had turned black and had a foul smell.
|
 |
Plant #7 was Cat Tails, started in March and examined in
September, 2002. We consider Cat Tails somewhat of a weed, so we did not
count every stem. However, the fabric grown plant clearly had three
times the number of stems (well over 100) than the same plant grown in
plastic. The Cat Tails had completely filled the fabric container, and
were taller than the plant grown in plastic. Cat Tails are not a popular
variety for us, but it did make a good addition to the study.
|
|
Conclusion
– Every plant we looked at had developed a markedly better
root structure in the fabric container as opposed to a plastic pot. The
roots had branched and filled the fabric, whereas in the plastic
container the roots were circled on the outside, often leaving areas in
the middle of the pot empty of roots.. The porosity of the fabric also
made a big difference in the health of the soil. The soil in the fabric
containers after six months in the pond was better, with a natural color
instead of a black rot, and did not have as much of a foul odor. With a
better root structure and healthier soil, the plants grown in fabric
containers far outperformed those same species grown in traditional
plastic pots in the same conditions.
A number of manufactures make fabric containers for the pond
industry. The fabric containers used in this study were “Pond Pots” from
Root Control, Inc. “Pond Pots” are made from a porous polypropylene
fabric that is extremely tough and will not rot even after years in a
pond. Little Giant Pump Company also markets a fabric container with the
brand name “Plant Pouch”. Scott Stayton, marketing manager for Little
Giant, says the company’s water-gardening customers prefer their “Plant
Pouch” over plastic containers not only because plants perform much
better but also because they are safer for fish. “The fabric holds in
soil completely,” said Stayton, “yet allows water to move through to all
the roots. Also, pond owners with expensive Koi do not have to be
concerned with any plastic harming the scales of their fish.”
Perhaps the largest aquatic grower using fabric containers is
Givhandy’s in Rydal, Georgia.
Givhandy’s is a wholesale grower supplying
aquatic plants to over 120 Home Depot stores in the southeast.
“We like
the “Pond Pots” because fabric gives us a better root structure”,
explains grower Marie Givhan, “when you get better roots, you will have
a better looking plant”.
| *Connie Kaye is the manager of Decorative Water
Gardens in Edmond, OK and was 2002 president of the Water Garden Society
of Oklahoma. Shirley Jo Kelly is the manager of Fish ‘N Fun, a retail
aquatic plant and fish store in Odessa, TX, found on the web at
www.fishandfun.com . Kurt Reiger
is president of Root Control, Inc. in Oklahoma City, OK |
How to Use Pond Pots Home Pond Pots Article
Contacts
Order Form
© 1997-2007 Root Control ® Inc.
800.521.8089
a growit Network Member
growit.com
|